StevenUniverse TheoryZone Wikia

Filter Posts Reset


Sort By

  • All
  • Following
This post is locked.
• 7/16/2016

Single Theory

Last month we had only one theory added to our wiki. Which means we can't remake a old pool or make a new one with random theories, since it wouldn't be fair for this specific theory. So I'm here to vote for a new rule:

When only one theory is made that month, that theory will be automatically considered the featured theory for that month, alongside with the author.
Instead, we could do pools with random theories, repeat the last month, etc.
Please give your suggestions below until August 1.
2 2
This post is locked.
• 6/8/2016

Confirmed and Disproved headcanons

Hello theorists! Until now, headcanons hadn't been so developed. But our headcanons share some real curious ideias that someday may be shown in the episodes. So before that happens I want to discuss with you, should headcanons have their own confirmed and disproved templates? Like theories already have? I letting you guys decide.
1 2
This post is locked.
• 1/20/2016

Template Gifs

Just a suggestion that I want to discuss with the staff and users: Our main wiki started some months ago to use gifs in featured, new, incomplete, 404 pages. I think we can do that here too. What you think? Leave your opinion in the comments below!
0 10
• 1/3/2016

Theory Template

Hello new theorists! Welcome to our wiki! Before start theorizing, be sure your theory follow this theory example. It's simple, and helps you to state your objective in the theory! Don't know how to create a page? Simply go to the right top corner of the wiki and click in Contribute>Add a Page.

Garnet is a Fusion

Theory Information
Garnet is a Fusion
Date of Publication
January 2, 2016
Skeke Blog
Publication Order
previous theory
future theory (leave EMPTY if does not have)
Contents[show] Summary (for big theories (lots of hints, much text, etc) (optional)
Give a little resume about your theory.
Garnet is a fusion, and she couldn't be because reasons in x episode

Theory (required)
example example example Here you should explain your idea, tell them what, why, since when, how.
Garnet is a fusion due to blah blah blah blah and she could since gems blah blah blah, then how she isn't a fusion if she has blah blah blah the gems probably know that blah blah blah.

Evidence (if very clear) (optional)
In the evidence section, you add the main reason, the proof of your theory and why may be cannon.
She is happy about fusion in Alone Together, she is happy about fusion and says is not hard to fuse for her. In Fusion Cuisine when Alexandrite is fusion the light blah blah blah.

Conclusion (optional)
Here you do like the Summary, but stating your evidences.
She is a Fusion because she can blah blah blah and she did that in there.

New to templates and linking stuff? Feel free to see other users theories too give you a idea!
Be sure to contact any staff if you have any trouble or question! We're happy to see you in our wiki!
2 3
• 10/10/2015

Headcannon Category

Someone should add a headcannon category onto the navigation bar for ideas that are plausible but don't yet have proof. There would have to be rules, though. Articles that have nothing to do with the show or are about crossovers would be out, so would shipping since it can't be debated and proven objectively. It would be similar to the WIP theories except they aren't hypothesis that can be easily proven with information already in the show. This is also similar to the earlier, "We'll Never Know" idea, but I think the name and the purpose fits better.
What do you think?
0 6
• 7/9/2015

Old Threads

As you may know; this wiki is still growing and developing and it's going to take time to become active enough to support a steady flow of browsing users and forum discussions.
For now I would like to question whether or not old forum posts should be closed. If you agree that they should be closed, how long should it go without a reply to warrent a closing?
0 4
• 7/4/2015

"We'll Never Know" Category

I was thinking we might consider adding a new category for Theories called "We'll Never Know".
This is for theories that, while interesting, are very unlikely to ever be addressed in the show, and so we'll probably never know if they are valid theories.
The best example currently is (in my opinion) "Mars Was Used To Make Gems". It is an interesting idea, but it does not seem likely we'll ever get any information in the show to confirm or disprove it.
So, should "We'll Never Know" be a category?
1 5
This post is locked.
• 7/3/2015

Pearl was in love with Rose Theory: Poll

This poll has concluded, the users have decided to keep the theory with the 'confirmed theory' template.
'From July 3rd to July 6th 2015, 13 voted had been submitted, the second option has won 11 to 3'.

JSSnippetsStack.push({dependencies:["/extensions/wikia/AjaxPoll/css/AjaxPoll.scss","/extensions/wikia/AjaxPoll/js/AjaxPoll.js"],callback:function(json){AjaxPoll.init(json)},id:"AjaxPoll.init"})Keep or Delete?  Delete the theory 2 Keep it as a confirmed theory 12 The poll was created at 20:49 on July 3, 2015, and so far 14 people voted. Please wait, submitting your vote...
You can view the original thread here.
0 0
This post is locked.
• 6/30/2015

Pearl was in Love with Rose Theory: Keep or Delete?

I see that the template on the top of Pearl was in Love with Rose has been changed again.
Let's not have an edit war. Nobody wins in that.
I propose we discuss it here on this thread then have a vote.
The problem starts with the Theory being added to this wiki after the concept seems to have already been confirmed by the show.
So, there are two sides to the argument, which I will try to summarize here. If anyone thinks I have not correctly represented either side please let me know and I will edit this post.
1.) The Theory should be deleted because it was not a prediction, but rather a statement of an already known fact.
2.) The Theory should remain, and have the Confirmed template, because, though it was not posted here until after the fact, it was none the less a widely discussed theory before hand that has been confirmed. Posting it on this wiki serves as a historical recording of the theory.
Note that if we decide to keep "Pearl was in Love with Rose" then it would be proper to add "Garnet Is A Fusion" to the wiki as well.
A new third option: (see #10 below for details)
3) We leave the theory alone, removing any template or category. Then at some point in the future (perhaps after the next Steven Bomb) we revisit the question. If there has been some completely unambiguous proof, such as Pearl saying she was in love with Rose on the show, or some completely explicit statement by someone attached to the show to that effect then we will decide on what to do.
1 13
• 6/25/2015


I want to check out everything that's here, but criminy I can't read all this white text on black.  Very painful on the eyes.Can we consider something more reader friendly?
0 12
• 5/30/2015

Vandalism Thread - Report Vandalism Here!

This is the thread where you can report vandalims.
NOTE: Staffs are recommended to follow this thread.
0 2
This post is locked.
• 5/25/2015

Adding Gemsona

Ummm......I was thinking if...Do you think we can add our Gemsonas to describe our theory? Example:
The red eye was not a gem but a machine created by spessartine (spessartine gemsona riding the red eye pic) and spessartine was riding the red eye and when it exploded, spessartine retreated to her gemstone and it was thrown far away until the orange spessartine gemstone was discovered by Garnet in Garnet's Universe, they are both same color pallete, the eye is hexagon like the gem, and the gemstone is not corrupt because it is not broken......The red eye could be spessartine's escape pod.

JSSnippetsStack.push({dependencies:["/extensions/wikia/AjaxPoll/css/AjaxPoll.scss","/extensions/wikia/AjaxPoll/js/AjaxPoll.js"],callback:function(json){AjaxPoll.init(json)},id:"AjaxPoll.init"})Vote  0 Yes :) 4 1 No! 8 The poll was created at 10:53 on May 25, 2015, and so far 13 people voted. Please wait, submitting your vote...
Sorry for the long story, I just want to remember my new theory.
0 9